AS SSD Benchmark Results
Website:
AS SSD
AS SSD is a freeware benchmarking tool designed just for SSDs, performing a battery of sequential read and write, as well as random read and write tests and sequential access times over a 3GB portion of the drive. As Windows 7's caching technology makes using more real world based tests like FC-Test almost impossible, this is the next best thing for judging sequential read and write speeds, as well as producing accurate access times and being wonderfully easy to use.
AS SSD also includes a a sub-suite of copy benchmarks with various different file patterns, but we found this was unable to offer reproducable results. We've also not included the 4K random read/write and 4k-64 Thread random read/write figures, as we feel Iometer is fairer representation of random performance.
-
Corsair P128 (18C1Q firmware, clean)
-
Corsair P128 (18C1Q firmware, dirty)
-
Corsair P128 (19C1Q firmware, clean)
-
Corsair P128 (19C1Q firmware, dirty)
-
Intel X25-M 160GB (02G2 firmware, clean)
-
Intel X25-M 160GB (02G2 firmware, dirty)
-
Intel X25-M 160GB (02HD firmware, clean)
-
Intel X25-M 160GB (02HD firmware, dirty)
-
OCZ Vertex 128GB (v1.3 firmware, clean)
-
OCZ Vertex 128GB (v1.3 firmware, dirty)
-
OCZ Vertex 128GB (v1.5 firmware, clean)
-
OCZ Vertex 128GB (v1.5 firmware, dirty)
-
0.094
-
0.299
-
0.095
-
0.251
-
0.060
-
0.946
-
0.060
-
0.061
-
0.147
-
0.153
-
0.145
-
0.146
seconds, lower is better
-
Corsair P128 (18C1Q firmware, clean)
-
Corsair P128 (18C1Q firmware, dirty)
-
Corsair P128 (19C1Q firmware, clean)
-
Corsair P128 (19C1Q firmware, dirty)
-
Intel X25-M 160GB (02G2 firmware, clean)
-
Intel X25-M 160GB (02G2 firmware, dirty)
-
Intel X25-M 160GB (02HD firmware, clean)
-
Intel X25-M 160GB (02HD firmware, dirty)
-
OCZ Vertex 128GB (v1.3 firmware, clean)
-
OCZ Vertex 128GB (v1.3 firmware, dirty)
-
OCZ Vertex 128GB (v1.5 firmware, clean)
-
OCZ Vertex 128GB (v1.5 firmware, dirty)
-
0.619
-
1.079
-
0.635
-
0.631
-
0.096
-
0.499
-
0.096
-
0.100
-
0.320
-
0.500
-
0.315
-
0.354
seconds, lower is better
For analysis of these results, please see the
Results Analysis page.
Want to comment? Please log in.